Sonyhat vor allem das Active Noise Cancelling nochmals verbessert. Laut einigen Testberichten allerdings auf Kosten des Klangs, der weniger detailreich ausfalle
TheShure AONIC 50 noise canceling is objectively better, but it differed from the Sony WH-1000XM4 by only 0.2 per our objective testing, where the AONIC 5o scored 7.5 and the XM4 scored 7.3. The Shure AONIC 50 noise canceling performance is stellar, particularly when it comes to combating low-frequency sounds between 60 and
TheApple AirPods Pro (2nd generation) Truly Wireless are better in-ears than the Sony WF-1000XM4 Truly Wireless. The Apple are more comfortable, have a
Accordingto our standard testing method, the Sony WH-1000XM4 lasts 19 hours, 59 minutes with ANC on and this falls short of the 30-hour specification. The Sony WH-1000XM5 outdoes this at 31 hours, 53 minutes with ANC on. Both headsets support fast charging with it being more efficient on the newer model.

SonyWF-1000XM4 vs. AirPods Pro: Active noise cancellation (Image credit: Regan Coule/Future) Sony improves on its stalwart ANC, stuffing similar adaptive noise

Soundwise, the AirPods Pro and the Sony WH-1000XM4 aren't even close. The AirPods Pro have an extremely smooth, flat frequency response and a pretty natural and rich midrange, but that's about it. To me it sounds very bass-light, and when there's bass it doesn't slam hard. There is no instrument separation and detail levels are average.

3LvU. 865 368 38 753 515 781 374 90

airpods pro 2 noise cancelling vs sony wh 1000xm4